Immigrants from Turkey Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Turkey Single Female Poverty
19.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,264,730 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370 and weighted average of 19.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.71% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Turkey influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Turkey simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants from Turkey Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.074% | 13.1% |
| Maximum | 7.3% | 29.1% |
| Range | 7.2% | 15.9% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 18.0% |
| Median | 2.3% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.9% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Turkey Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.074% | 204,053,594 | 21.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 12,270,635 | 16.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.77% | 2,167,289 | 17.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 780,812 | 15.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 274,603 | 14.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 325,533 | 14.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 243,868 | 19.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 57,150 | 13.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 41,631 | 16.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.99% | 3,847 | 16.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 9,946 | 22.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 17,240 | 17.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 1,648 | 20.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 11,458 | 29.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 5,476 | 16.3% |