Turkish vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,673,890 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Turkish	Immigrants from Ethiopia
Minimum	0.78%	1.3%
Maximum	16.2%	15.9%
Range	15.5%	14.6%
Mean	4.6%	5.9%
Median	3.6%	5.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.6%	4.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.9%	6.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	1.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.6%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.5%	3.2%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Scottish	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.3%
Swiss	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.3%
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Delaware (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Russia	78.7 /100 \| #148	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.6 /100 \| #149	Good 5.0%
Brazilians	78.3 /100 \| #150	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	77.3 /100 \| #151	Good 5.0%
Albanians	77.2 /100 \| #152	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	76.3 /100 \| #153	Good 5.0%
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%
Argentineans	70.7 /100 \| #157	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	70.4 /100 \| #158	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	70.3 /100 \| #159	Good 5.1%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.5 /100 \| #160	Good 5.1%
Ethiopians	68.1 /100 \| #161	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	66.5 /100 \| #162	Good 5.1%