Immigrants from Philippines No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Select to Compare
No Vehicles in Household
Immigrants from Philippines No Vehicles in Household
8.5%
NO VEHICLES AVAILABLE
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,724,480 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157 and weighted average of 8.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in percentage of households with no vehicle available.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of households with no vehicle available does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Philippines influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of households with no vehicle available within an area, or if Immigrants from Philippines simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of households with no vehicle available due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants from Philippines No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines Data | No Vehicles in Household Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 19.4% |
| Range | 66.5% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 7.1% |
| Median | 14.9% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 3.6% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Philippines Percentile | Sample Size | No Vehicles in Household |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 295,978,282 | 8.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 80,682,635 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 28,634,572 | 7.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 17,080,069 | 6.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 13,463,843 | 7.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 8,692,462 | 8.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 8,061,731 | 5.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 3,503,811 | 10.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 3,104,188 | 7.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,734,453 | 6.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 726,671 | 14.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 1,376,949 | 11.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 988,686 | 7.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 774,248 | 8.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 526,394 | 5.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 874,838 | 5.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 732,896 | 10.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.65% | 234,598 | 4.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.21% | 276,571 | 3.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 10,409 | 5.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 154,428 | 4.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.68% | 1,666 | 7.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 98,961 | 4.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 265,513 | 8.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 423,749 | 8.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.79% | 115,516 | 4.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.15% | 27,278 | 5.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 184,375 | 7.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.15% | 152,755 | 5.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.73% | 52,163 | 2.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.14% | 3,766 | 11.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.88% | 52,871 | 3.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 130,885 | 3.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.82% | 220 | 2.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 4,598 | 19.4% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.51% | 337 | 0.84% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.22% | 4,628 | 4.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.84% | 12,906 | 6.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.04% | 1,376 | 8.8% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.86% | 65,125 | 8.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.28% | 208,714 | 7.3% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.61% | 6,469 | 2.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.94% | 20,127 | 4.8% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 2,255 | 5.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.94% | 7,179 | 9.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.15% | 4,820 | 12.6% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.18% | 28,090 | 7.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 52,328 | 12.8% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 26,509 | 7.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.90% | 72,605 | 7.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.79% | 922 | 2.7% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.24% | 16,457 | 3.4% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 7,922 | 9.3% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.98% | 1,461 | 5.1% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.16% | 63 | 15.0% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.18% | 3,576 | 4.9% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.96% | 45,457 | 12.9% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.06% | 4,342 | 5.0% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.52% | 766 | 5.5% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.69% | 2,996 | 2.0% |