Immigrants from Eastern Europe Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Eastern Europe Family Households
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,514,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 64.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.26% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Eastern Europe influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Eastern Europe simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants from North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe Data | Family Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 33.7% |
| Maximum | 88.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.7% | 66.3% |
| Mean | 17.5% | 68.7% |
| Median | 13.9% | 66.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 63.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 69.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.2% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.1% | 13.4% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 263,045,401 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 95,439,047 | 63.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 47,502,347 | 62.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 20,509,134 | 63.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 14,830,735 | 62.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 6,901,505 | 64.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 12,436,122 | 60.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 3,440,793 | 65.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 2,654,898 | 66.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 1,668,732 | 64.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 1,074,776 | 66.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 781,224 | 67.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.26% | 794,965 | 62.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 451,319 | 68.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 407,964 | 64.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 380,182 | 63.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 374,224 | 69.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.75% | 33,254 | 74.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.15% | 257,708 | 73.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.76% | 248,224 | 63.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.24% | 354,466 | 66.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.86% | 411,462 | 66.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.32% | 138,119 | 67.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 164,262 | 70.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.35% | 235,236 | 70.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.81% | 109,026 | 69.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.25% | 79,100 | 65.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.63% | 204,296 | 66.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 46,399 | 66.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.27% | 22,886 | 65.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.75% | 29,743 | 67.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 153,689 | 65.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 820 | 51.2% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.86% | 84 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.18% | 66,175 | 74.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.64% | 30,080 | 62.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.61% | 357 | 96.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.33% | 1,864 | 60.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.89% | 15,432 | 67.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.18% | 1,539 | 56.1% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.24% | 26,408 | 68.3% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.50% | 8,942 | 69.2% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 23,200 | 67.7% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.24% | 202 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.66% | 47,893 | 63.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.36% | 402 | 58.5% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.41% | 238 | 34.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.00% | 25 | 100.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.17% | 2,027 | 65.7% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.78% | 23,676 | 64.2% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.31% | 274 | 91.9% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.81% | 181 | 33.7% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.35% | 83,069 | 62.6% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 68 | 100.0% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 42 | 100.0% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.89% | 27 | 78.6% |