West Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
West Indian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
West Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19
31.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,845,757 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 31.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.5% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of West Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of West Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 within an area, or if West Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to West Indians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Tohono O'odham (31.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Ecuadorian (31.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Caribbean (31.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Soviet Union (31.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Dominican (31.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 31.8% |
Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 31.7% |
Filipinos | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 31.7% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 31.6% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 31.5% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 31.4% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 31.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 31.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 31.3% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 31.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 31.2% |
Immigrants from China | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 31.1% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 31.1% |
Immigrants from Taiwan | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 31.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 31.0% |
West Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | West Indian Data | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Data |
Minimum | 0.054% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 11.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 11.2% | 87.5% |
Mean | 3.7% | 31.4% |
Median | 2.9% | 28.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 35.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 15.7% |
Correlation Details
West Indian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 173,611,284 | 37.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 39,777,110 | 35.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 13,150,941 | 35.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 6,108,120 | 35.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 4,072,878 | 36.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 2,006,937 | 34.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 10,353,297 | 23.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 1,094,105 | 35.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 556,856 | 34.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 298,666 | 35.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 438,467 | 28.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 336,711 | 23.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 185,795 | 26.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 133,021 | 26.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 200,679 | 23.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 141,722 | 39.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 205,663 | 19.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 149,877 | 21.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 287,567 | 23.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 46,611 | 23.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.04% | 4,502 | 22.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 14,763 | 45.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.32% | 190,474 | 19.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.61% | 75,725 | 28.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.85% | 4,648 | 31.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 68,589 | 13.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 617 | 20.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 7,863 | 25.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 22,122 | 34.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.81% | 3,181 | 41.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.91% | 3,114 | 41.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.50% | 32,296 | 16.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 85,425 | 24.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.93% | 83,125 | 12.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.09% | 286 | 48.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.85% | 3,117 | 70.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.06% | 10,526 | 17.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.27% | 78,506 | 14.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 571 | 100.0% |