Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCastro ValleyChicoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNorth HollywoodNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles

0.0%
2.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.900211.8%2.0%(-0.139)#5751.2%(+0.647)#13,174
2.900591.3%2.0%(-0.651)#6581.2%(+0.135)#14,891
3.900031.3%2.0%(-0.702)#6651.2%(+0.084)#15,088
4.900231.0%2.0%(-0.941)#7171.2%(-0.155)#16,030
5.900400.94%2.0%(-1.05)#7451.2%(-0.264)#16,527
6.900580.85%2.0%(-1.13)#7671.2%(-0.346)#16,960
7.900480.85%2.0%(-1.14)#7691.2%(-0.353)#16,987
8.900110.80%2.0%(-1.19)#7891.2%(-0.400)#17,242
9.900220.62%2.0%(-1.36)#8841.2%(-0.577)#18,333
10.900020.58%2.0%(-1.40)#9061.2%(-0.616)#18,600
11.900010.57%2.0%(-1.41)#9121.2%(-0.626)#18,678
12.900610.56%2.0%(-1.43)#9221.2%(-0.641)#18,786
13.900160.54%2.0%(-1.44)#9301.2%(-0.657)#18,916
14.900100.48%2.0%(-1.50)#9741.2%(-0.715)#19,413
15.900370.48%2.0%(-1.51)#9781.2%(-0.721)#19,462
16.900420.48%2.0%(-1.51)#9811.2%(-0.723)#19,480
17.900180.46%2.0%(-1.53)#9961.2%(-0.742)#19,632
18.900070.43%2.0%(-1.55)#1,0191.2%(-0.769)#19,892
19.900460.43%2.0%(-1.56)#1,0201.2%(-0.771)#19,911
20.900620.39%2.0%(-1.59)#1,0451.2%(-0.809)#20,237
21.900040.36%2.0%(-1.63)#1,0661.2%(-0.839)#20,544
22.900440.35%2.0%(-1.63)#1,0731.2%(-0.846)#20,616
23.900320.35%2.0%(-1.63)#1,0761.2%(-0.848)#20,632
24.900650.35%2.0%(-1.64)#1,0771.2%(-0.849)#20,647
25.900170.35%2.0%(-1.64)#1,0781.2%(-0.849)#20,650
26.900470.34%2.0%(-1.64)#1,0861.2%(-0.857)#20,720
27.900630.33%2.0%(-1.66)#1,0991.2%(-0.869)#20,846
28.900250.32%2.0%(-1.66)#1,1061.2%(-0.877)#20,922
29.900270.28%2.0%(-1.71)#1,1381.2%(-0.921)#21,437
30.900450.27%2.0%(-1.72)#1,1511.2%(-0.930)#21,546
31.900890.27%2.0%(-1.72)#1,1531.2%(-0.933)#21,578
32.900570.26%2.0%(-1.72)#1,1551.2%(-0.934)#21,590
33.900060.26%2.0%(-1.73)#1,1681.2%(-0.944)#21,708
34.900330.25%2.0%(-1.74)#1,1781.2%(-0.951)#21,779
35.900380.22%2.0%(-1.76)#1,2011.2%(-0.977)#22,079
36.900190.21%2.0%(-1.77)#1,2091.2%(-0.987)#22,204
37.900660.20%2.0%(-1.78)#1,2221.2%(-0.997)#22,329
38.900080.20%2.0%(-1.79)#1,2251.2%(-1.00)#22,382
39.900490.20%2.0%(-1.79)#1,2261.2%(-1.00)#22,403
40.900050.20%2.0%(-1.79)#1,2271.2%(-1.00)#22,405
41.900340.13%2.0%(-1.85)#1,2911.2%(-1.07)#23,247
42.900260.11%2.0%(-1.87)#1,3151.2%(-1.09)#23,502
43.900360.069%2.0%(-1.92)#1,3711.2%(-1.13)#24,109
44.900280.069%2.0%(-1.92)#1,3721.2%(-1.13)#24,115
45.900310.059%2.0%(-1.93)#1,3791.2%(-1.14)#24,239
46.900410.054%2.0%(-1.93)#1,3851.2%(-1.15)#24,300
47.900240.0046%2.0%(-1.98)#1,4081.2%(-1.19)#24,640

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
1.8%
#2
1.3%
#3
1.3%
#4
1.0%
#5
0.94%
#6
0.85%
#7
0.85%
#8
0.80%
#9
0.62%
#10
0.58%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles, CA?
90021 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles, CA with 1.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in Los Angeles is 0.37%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in California?
Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in California is 2.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting in the United States is 1.2%.