Costa Rican Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Select to Compare
Disability Age 35 to 64
Costa Rican Disability Age 35 to 64
10.7%
DISABILITY | AGE 35 TO 64
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,472,399 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 10.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.40% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Costa Ricans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 within an area, or if Costa Ricans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants from Albania | 92.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants from Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
Costa Rican Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican Data | Disability Age 35 to 64 Data |
Minimum | 0.054% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 26.9% | 45.1% |
Range | 26.8% | 44.0% |
Mean | 5.2% | 12.6% |
Median | 3.9% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 9.0% |
Correlation Details
Costa Rican Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 193,611,142 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 35,439,717 | 10.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 11,335,219 | 10.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 4,989,410 | 10.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,809,626 | 10.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,719,023 | 10.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 890,528 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 644,350 | 10.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 353,272 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 323,230 | 10.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 218,565 | 10.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 139,219 | 10.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 147,760 | 9.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 71,675 | 11.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 202,355 | 8.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 90,548 | 8.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 38,329 | 9.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 34,750 | 10.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 7,766 | 12.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 45,765 | 11.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 30,438 | 7.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 70,544 | 7.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 40,321 | 6.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 8,266 | 5.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 24,178 | 2.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 12,649 | 13.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 1,273 | 23.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,292 | 5.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 21,507 | 6.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 30,866 | 11.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 8,954 | 9.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 786 | 37.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 9,781 | 8.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 9,105 | 23.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 501 | 7.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 3,309 | 14.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 16,602 | 10.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 616 | 12.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 1,519 | 5.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 8,287 | 4.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 1,594 | 5.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,373 | 13.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 5,226 | 13.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 9,676 | 8.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 915 | 33.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 398 | 40.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.41% | 297 | 6.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.55% | 159 | 22.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 14,778 | 7.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.14% | 372 | 16.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 11,906 | 6.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.07% | 1,132 | 12.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.81% | 657 | 6.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 98 | 45.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 4,771 | 1.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 253 | 24.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 167 | 30.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.88% | 584 | 4.5% |