Immigrants from Fiji Single Father Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
Select to Compare
Single Father Households
Immigrants from Fiji Single Father Households
2.7%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,616,841 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779 and weighted average of 2.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.60% in percentage of single father households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of single father households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Fiji influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of single father households within an area, or if Immigrants from Fiji simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of single father households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Choctaw (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Malaysian (2.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Blackfeet (2.7%, a difference of 0.62%), Puget Sound Salish (2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Chickasaw (2.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
Immigrants from Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.7% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants from Cambodia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 2.7% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 2.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants from Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 2.7% |
Malaysians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 2.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 2.8% |
Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 2.8% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 2.8% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 2.8% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 2.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants from Fiji Single Father Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji Data | Single Father Households Data |
Minimum | 0.020% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 3.6% | 4.5% |
Range | 3.6% | 2.3% |
Mean | 1.1% | 2.9% |
Median | 0.96% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.45% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.5% | 3.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 0.64% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.82% | 0.63% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Fiji Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.020% | 73,451,045 | 2.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 9,739,799 | 2.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 3,283,370 | 2.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 1,978,289 | 2.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 1,495,895 | 2.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.50% | 201,598 | 2.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 525,358 | 2.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 648,311 | 3.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 377,170 | 2.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 160,299 | 2.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 116,498 | 2.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 279,364 | 2.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 604,418 | 3.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 199,405 | 2.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 110,572 | 2.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 85,410 | 3.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 84,068 | 3.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 77,712 | 2.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 60,850 | 3.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 41,311 | 4.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 96,099 | 4.5% |