Immigrants from Philippines Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Select to Compare
Vision Disability
Immigrants from Philippines Vision Disability
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,744,203 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 2.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.0057% in percentage of population with vision disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with vision disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Philippines influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with vision disability within an area, or if Immigrants from Philippines simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with vision disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Ugandan (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants from Philippines Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines Data | Vision Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 7.1% |
| Range | 66.5% | 6.9% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 2.2% |
| Median | 14.7% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.7% | 0.59% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 1.2% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Philippines Percentile | Sample Size | Vision Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 296,565,098 | 2.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 80,847,713 | 2.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 28,736,697 | 2.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 17,135,314 | 1.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 13,488,978 | 2.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 8,722,280 | 2.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 8,070,374 | 1.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 3,507,336 | 2.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 3,118,358 | 2.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,741,679 | 2.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 728,487 | 1.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 1,388,392 | 2.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 989,905 | 2.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 773,534 | 1.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 527,776 | 1.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 876,236 | 1.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 736,697 | 2.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.66% | 243,645 | 1.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.21% | 276,082 | 2.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 10,198 | 1.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 154,428 | 1.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.68% | 1,666 | 7.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 98,961 | 1.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 265,513 | 2.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 423,749 | 1.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.79% | 117,816 | 1.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 23,432 | 1.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 184,375 | 2.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.15% | 152,755 | 2.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.73% | 52,163 | 2.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.14% | 3,766 | 2.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.88% | 48,452 | 1.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 130,742 | 2.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.82% | 220 | 1.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 4,506 | 3.1% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.51% | 337 | 5.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.21% | 4,898 | 3.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.83% | 13,120 | 0.96% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.04% | 1,376 | 0.22% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.86% | 65,125 | 1.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.28% | 208,714 | 1.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.61% | 6,469 | 2.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.94% | 20,127 | 1.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 2,255 | 1.4% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.94% | 7,179 | 2.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.15% | 4,820 | 2.4% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.18% | 28,593 | 2.1% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 52,328 | 1.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 26,398 | 1.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.90% | 72,605 | 2.1% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.79% | 922 | 0.33% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.24% | 16,457 | 1.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 7,922 | 3.7% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.18% | 3,576 | 2.4% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.63% | 98 | 7.1% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.96% | 45,457 | 2.5% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.06% | 4,342 | 2.8% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.52% | 766 | 4.3% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.69% | 2,996 | 0.33% |