Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Select to Compare
Vision Disability
Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in percentage of population with vision disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Alaskan Athabascans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with vision disability within an area, or if Alaskan Athabascans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with vision disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan Data | Vision Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.025% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 16.7% |
| Range | 100.0% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 40.5% | 4.9% |
| Median | 26.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.4% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 66.3% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.2% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 33.9% | 3.4% |
Correlation Details
| Alaskan Athabascan Percentile | Sample Size | Vision Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.025% | 44,547,668 | 2.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 226,571 | 2.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 115,722 | 2.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 514,247 | 2.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 152,665 | 2.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 13,546 | 4.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 79,551 | 2.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 6,568 | 3.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 17,967 | 3.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 2,061 | 2.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 29,293 | 1.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 20,604 | 1.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.07% | 1,170 | 3.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 33,211 | 2.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.65% | 405 | 3.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 5,499 | 2.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.96% | 19,529 | 3.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.13% | 964 | 3.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.26% | 6,542 | 0.32% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.97% | 234 | 1.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 182 | 1.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.22% | 92 | 4.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 116 | 3.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 235 | 2.1% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.38% | 1,927 | 8.4% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 1,167 | 2.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.39% | 1,052 | 3.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.16% | 388 | 10.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 522 | 1.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 761 | 3.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.65% | 439 | 4.8% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.58% | 71 | 7.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.34% | 1,719 | 9.4% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.20% | 508 | 3.9% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.05% | 452 | 9.8% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 470 | 8.3% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.89% | 329 | 3.1% |
[ 57.5% - 58.0% ] 57.74% | 1,254 | 1.1% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.87% | 69 | 5.8% |
[ 61.5% - 62.0% ] 61.76% | 68 | 4.4% |
[ 65.0% - 65.5% ] 65.45% | 220 | 10.9% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.85% | 272 | 9.6% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.15% | 650 | 8.0% |
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.99% | 274 | 5.2% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.81% | 252 | 9.1% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.07% | 270 | 5.3% |
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.73% | 91 | 15.4% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.80% | 388 | 9.3% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.31% | 952 | 6.7% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.46% | 130 | 3.1% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.37% | 252 | 5.2% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.18% | 428 | 2.4% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.26% | 364 | 2.7% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.62% | 420 | 5.7% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.53% | 554 | 1.8% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.95% | 398 | 5.0% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.95% | 174 | 3.4% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.37% | 498 | 5.2% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.28% | 238 | 6.7% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.00% | 201 | 10.9% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 252 | 16.7% |