Indian (Asian) vs Chippewa Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Chippewa
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Chippewa
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Chippewa Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,223,906 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,880,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 13.1%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 16.1% |
| Range | 7.3% | 15.6% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.78% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Self-Care Disability
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Arapaho (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Nonimmigrants (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Shoshone (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.7% |