Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
11.6%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 75
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,762,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 11.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.33% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Jordanian (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Immigrants from Japan | 91.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 91.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Syrians | 91.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Jordanians | 90.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 90.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 90.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 90.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants from Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |
Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 40.0% |
| Range | 23.8% | 38.3% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 14.2% |
| Median | 6.4% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 7.7% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,120,492 | 12.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,114,009 | 9.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,542,139 | 10.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,559,869 | 9.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 807,589 | 9.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 459,921 | 8.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 231,210 | 9.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 239,025 | 10.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 85,448 | 11.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 85,122 | 9.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 51,824 | 10.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 40,903 | 11.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 54,239 | 12.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 14,829 | 12.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 9,381 | 34.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 65,894 | 15.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,243 | 14.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 15,814 | 8.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 7,133 | 7.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 5,340 | 20.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 1,072 | 10.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 29.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 19.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 16.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 25,953 | 14.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 4,204 | 17.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 1,611 | 15.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 8.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,253 | 12.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 3,687 | 11.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 3,585 | 17.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 5.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 17.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 10.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 450 | 21.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 4,076 | 11.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.05% | 440 | 2.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 11.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 2,735 | 10.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 5,025 | 12.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 23.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 22.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 1.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 6.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 15.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.94% | 1,219 | 31.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 2.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 16.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 40.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 6,707 | 19.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 4,739 | 14.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 4.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,473 | 10.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 10.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 9.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 695 | 14.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 22.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 24.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 9.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 10.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 190 | 11.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 2.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 16.7% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 16.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 29.4% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 29.4% |