Russian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Russian
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Russian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
11.6%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 75
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,147,306 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 11.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Russians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Russians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 within an area, or if Russians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Russians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Chickasaw (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Turkish (11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Immigrants from Ethiopia | 91.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Syrians | 91.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Jordanians | 90.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 90.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants from Kuwait | 90.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants from Singapore | 90.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 87.0 /100 | #113 | Excellent 11.7% |
Russian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Data |
Minimum | 0.22% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 71.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.7% | 98.9% |
Mean | 15.0% | 18.4% |
Median | 12.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 22.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 21.9% |
Correlation Details
Russian Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 231,451,806 | 12.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 124,560,428 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 57,644,452 | 10.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 35,078,086 | 11.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 24,523,271 | 14.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 8,134,063 | 10.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.98% | 5,511,130 | 11.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 3,229,265 | 10.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.92% | 2,355,078 | 10.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 2,184,516 | 11.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 1,207,155 | 10.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 1,283,384 | 12.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 690,844 | 11.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 752,934 | 8.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 607,457 | 9.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 366,217 | 12.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 435,068 | 12.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 290,533 | 10.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 112,525 | 10.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 219,676 | 9.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.39% | 140,362 | 10.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.79% | 75,372 | 30.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.39% | 49,536 | 5.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.88% | 25,293 | 6.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.31% | 21,137 | 6.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.74% | 10,230 | 11.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.04% | 28,811 | 13.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.48% | 649 | 19.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.93% | 13,967 | 5.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 3,690 | 11.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.00% | 15,895 | 9.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.40% | 11,390 | 9.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.08% | 6,942 | 8.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.47% | 601 | 45.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 4,889 | 8.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.29% | 1,688 | 8.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.99% | 1,395 | 5.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.32% | 1,039 | 6.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.60% | 83,069 | 37.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.61% | 2,289 | 30.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.21% | 2,108 | 27.7% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.47% | 2,530 | 10.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.90% | 842 | 3.8% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.36% | 618 | 10.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.40% | 1,906 | 17.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 291 | 13.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.19% | 789 | 20.2% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.16% | 178 | 56.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.55% | 364 | 12.8% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.18% | 891 | 1.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.12% | 137 | 7.7% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.14% | 74 | 100.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 267 | 18.8% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 51 | 100.0% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.88% | 128 | 100.0% |