Immigrants from Malaysia Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Malaysia Family Households
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
17.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,925,894 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304 and weighted average of 64.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 3.0% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Malaysia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Malaysia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants from North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants from Malaysia Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia Data | Family Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.018% | 34.5% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 85.4% |
| Range | 6.7% | 50.9% |
| Mean | 1.3% | 62.8% |
| Median | 1.1% | 64.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.52% | 59.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 68.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 11.0% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Malaysia Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.018% | 81,194,885 | 62.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.047% | 46,605,365 | 63.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 22,243,381 | 63.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 20,001,038 | 60.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 9,241,551 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 3,796,210 | 65.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 3,909,570 | 64.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 2,293,529 | 69.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 1,747,185 | 65.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 1,031,450 | 64.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 974,555 | 64.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 902,530 | 70.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 481,159 | 58.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 467,218 | 67.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 296,741 | 61.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 262,376 | 65.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 298,715 | 65.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 232,451 | 66.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 170,599 | 64.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 264,999 | 64.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 252,820 | 66.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 150,698 | 78.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 167,532 | 62.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 144,038 | 66.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 45,317 | 75.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86% | 146,073 | 68.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 35,836 | 63.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 82,653 | 68.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 28,641 | 77.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 26,662 | 68.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 35,266 | 47.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 7,011 | 34.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 638 | 85.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 27,843 | 67.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 21,887 | 59.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 2,696 | 74.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 106,526 | 67.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 44,655 | 74.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 9,512 | 56.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 6,400 | 81.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.46% | 4,168 | 80.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 9,841 | 59.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 12,223 | 49.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 8,843 | 47.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 11,805 | 61.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 5,928 | 55.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 27,010 | 37.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 5,569 | 55.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 6,916 | 69.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 42,621 | 72.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 9,282 | 59.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 15,667 | 44.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 170 | 39.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 1,031 | 68.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,200 | 60.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 1,562 | 38.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 545 | 61.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.81% | 498 | 64.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 621 | 72.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 296 | 36.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 235 | 57.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 145 | 77.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,507 | 47.7% |