Immigrants from Ecuador Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Ecuador Family Households
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,888,190 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714 and weighted average of 64.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.59% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Ecuador influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Ecuador simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Italian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Panamanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants from Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants from Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants from Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants from Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants from China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.080% | 57.2% |
Maximum | 59.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.3% | 42.8% |
Mean | 8.7% | 69.0% |
Median | 6.8% | 67.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 64.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 71.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 7.8% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Ecuador Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.080% | 209,708,203 | 64.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 26,062,091 | 64.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 8,420,567 | 67.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 5,749,758 | 64.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 12,135,239 | 61.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 2,095,819 | 66.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 986,824 | 67.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 900,350 | 65.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 615,613 | 66.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 374,051 | 69.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 349,510 | 69.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 171,989 | 65.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 177,201 | 62.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 145,666 | 59.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29% | 203,298 | 64.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 212,515 | 71.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.88% | 384,726 | 67.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 108,545 | 64.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 38,623 | 59.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 241,294 | 70.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.03% | 506,053 | 62.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.37% | 44,256 | 75.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 170,386 | 64.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 7.00% | 87,829 | 65.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 167,696 | 69.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.68% | 32,177 | 71.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 128,918 | 57.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14% | 117,803 | 61.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.37% | 124,391 | 70.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.03% | 58,717 | 63.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.41% | 5,864 | 78.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.66% | 28,230 | 67.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.94% | 79,800 | 64.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30% | 14,649 | 68.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.62% | 640 | 82.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.89% | 9,283 | 75.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 8,178 | 89.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.30% | 21,040 | 67.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 6,951 | 73.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.02% | 10,026 | 69.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 4,407 | 74.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.14% | 112,750 | 76.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.50% | 5,587 | 65.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.80% | 57,927 | 69.2% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.33% | 2,718 | 79.7% |
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.38% | 32 | 100.0% |