Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,926,469 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 13.8%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Minimum	1.7%	0.63%
Maximum	17.6%	14.6%
Range	16.0%	14.0%
Mean	7.8%	5.8%
Median	7.0%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.5%	4.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.6%	6.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.1%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.4%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.3%	2.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| South America	3.1 /100 \| #237	Tragic 5.7%
Cherokee	2.7 /100 \| #238	Tragic 5.8%
Venezuelans	2.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 5.8%
Fijians	2.5 /100 \| #240	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Panama	2.5 /100 \| #241	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	2.4 /100 \| #242	Tragic 5.8%
Somalis	2.3 /100 \| #243	Tragic 5.8%
Chickasaw	2.3 /100 \| #244	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	2.1 /100 \| #245	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	1.8 /100 \| #246	Tragic 5.8%
Iraqis	1.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 5.9%
Cree	1.2 /100 \| #248	Tragic 5.9%
Tsimshian	1.1 /100 \| #249	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.1 /100 \| #250	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	1.0 /100 \| #251	Tragic 5.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Cameroon	77.3 /100 \| #151	Good 5.0%
Albanians	77.2 /100 \| #152	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	76.3 /100 \| #153	Good 5.0%
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%
Argentineans	70.7 /100 \| #157	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	70.4 /100 \| #158	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	70.3 /100 \| #159	Good 5.1%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.5 /100 \| #160	Good 5.1%
Ethiopians	68.1 /100 \| #161	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	66.5 /100 \| #162	Good 5.1%
Sierra Leoneans	64.1 /100 \| #163	Good 5.1%
Hawaiians	62.3 /100 \| #164	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	62.2 /100 \| #165	Good 5.1%