Black/African American vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Black/African American
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Australians
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,220,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 50.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Black/African American | Australian |
Minimum | 4.0% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 73.3% |
Range | 16.3% | 72.2% |
Mean | 7.2% | 6.5% |
Median | 6.8% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |