Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Currently Married
Chickasaw Currently Married
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.24% in percentage of population currently married.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population currently married within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population currently married due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants from Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Currently Married Data |
Minimum | 0.032% | 27.5% |
Maximum | 25.7% | 68.4% |
Range | 25.7% | 40.9% |
Mean | 8.4% | 48.9% |
Median | 7.4% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 45.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 7.4% |
Correlation Details
Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Currently Married |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,669,888 | 44.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,310,146 | 49.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,606,572 | 50.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,615,670 | 46.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 826,043 | 45.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 474,840 | 50.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 233,583 | 49.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 249,739 | 48.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 89,231 | 52.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,765 | 45.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 53,323 | 50.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 50.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 55,156 | 49.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 48.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 16,025 | 52.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,875 | 42.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,539 | 47.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 46.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 54.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 53.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 49.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 43.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 52.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 50.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 43.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 4,529 | 54.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 2,552 | 57.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 42.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,906 | 47.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 4,596 | 52.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86% | 290 | 56.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,318 | 43.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17% | 665 | 49.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 45.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 56.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 50.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 55.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 55.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 49.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 47.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 43.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 55.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 55.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 50.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 50.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60% | 651 | 68.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 53.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 1,803 | 49.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 44.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 54.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 351 | 46.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 49.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 60.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 45.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 51.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 57.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 43.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 65.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,629 | 35.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 45.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 56.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 8,460 | 44.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 28.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 57.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 48.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 27.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 59.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 190 | 33.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 58.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 145 | 55.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 42.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 34.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 37.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05% | 114 | 55.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 36.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 50.1% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 32.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 53.3% |