Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT | 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,812,598 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 4.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.62% in unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Comanche (4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants from Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants from North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Data |
Minimum | 0.030% | 0.98% |
Maximum | 15.3% | 36.2% |
Range | 15.3% | 35.2% |
Mean | 3.7% | 9.5% |
Median | 2.7% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 9.0% |
Correlation Details
Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 129,640,287 | 4.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,539,367 | 5.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 853,431 | 5.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,323,303 | 3.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 702,187 | 4.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 274,982 | 3.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 64,153 | 9.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 169,297 | 4.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 35,542 | 6.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 8,888 | 7.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.90% | 14,167 | 6.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 15,038 | 11.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 15,728 | 11.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 11,290 | 8.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 1,175 | 16.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 45,410 | 2.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 2,337 | 1.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 1,048 | 7.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 1,264 | 7.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 1,725 | 15.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 15,358 | 2.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 24,784 | 1.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 1,513 | 36.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,388 | 0.98% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.65% | 177 | 34.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 4,613 | 27.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.41% | 2,020 | 6.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.19% | 2,335 | 15.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 6.2% |