Czech Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Czech
Select to Compare
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Czech Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT | SENIORS > 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 413,421,008 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424 and weighted average of 4.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.26% in unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechs and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Czechs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Norwegian (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Lebanese (4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Kenyan (4.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Iraqi (4.7%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
| Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Creek | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants from Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Lebanese | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Iraqis | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Houma | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Ugandans | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Czech Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech Data | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Data |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 48.5% | 35.5% |
| Range | 48.3% | 35.1% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 7.1% |
| Median | 9.1% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 6.4% |
Correlation Details
| Czech Percentile | Sample Size | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 244,918,299 | 5.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 100,389,368 | 4.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 31,783,859 | 4.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 14,278,352 | 4.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 8,095,919 | 4.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 4,522,650 | 4.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 2,696,925 | 4.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 1,370,049 | 5.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 1,005,798 | 5.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 758,287 | 5.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 949,193 | 3.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 393,180 | 4.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.90% | 206,852 | 5.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.12% | 422,882 | 2.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.49% | 499,906 | 3.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 288,445 | 3.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.04% | 177,235 | 5.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 172,446 | 4.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 33,860 | 7.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 32,107 | 10.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.26% | 37,057 | 5.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 63,389 | 2.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.93% | 35,683 | 3.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 37,311 | 1.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 26,758 | 7.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 7,141 | 6.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 44,441 | 1.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.44% | 21,066 | 9.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.75% | 6,353 | 11.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.41% | 6,078 | 1.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.62% | 5,748 | 8.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 13,682 | 6.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.43% | 7,730 | 3.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.97% | 30,700 | 2.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 10,718 | 2.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.53% | 5,168 | 4.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.27% | 2,355 | 5.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.52% | 1,150 | 4.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.74% | 2,637 | 17.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.28% | 241 | 11.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.55% | 2,162 | 20.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 14.00% | 15,334 | 1.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.75% | 5,146 | 5.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.05% | 3,217 | 6.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.55% | 10,890 | 10.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.94% | 822 | 35.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.43% | 986 | 2.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 154 | 11.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.29% | 4,864 | 0.40% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.15% | 4,832 | 1.7% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.27% | 6,133 | 1.3% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.60% | 927 | 9.3% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.46% | 1,451 | 29.4% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.38% | 609 | 13.6% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.94% | 513 | 12.4% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.14% | 350 | 12.9% |
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.49% | 1,235 | 7.4% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.49% | 365 | 16.1% |