Hungarian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Hungarian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
9.7%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,559,616 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240 and weighted average of 9.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.18% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Lithuania (9.7%, a difference of 0.22%), French (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Carpatho Rusyn (9.7%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Estonians | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 99.5 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Hungarians | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Filipinos | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Slavs | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Afghans | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants from England | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Hungarian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 41.1% | 43.2% |
| Range | 40.8% | 41.3% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 12.6% |
| Median | 11.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 8.1% |
Correlation Details
| Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 355,929,590 | 10.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 85,243,722 | 9.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 21,684,132 | 8.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,529,846 | 8.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 4,022,057 | 8.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 2,211,580 | 8.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 1,818,517 | 8.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,293,982 | 9.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 895,550 | 7.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 449,615 | 7.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 430,828 | 15.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 152,138 | 9.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 144,384 | 15.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 115,392 | 9.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 76,412 | 9.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 67,879 | 14.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 41,056 | 9.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 24,838 | 16.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.15% | 18,819 | 9.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 11,811 | 11.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.41% | 3,439 | 5.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 54,300 | 29.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 25,979 | 7.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 17,972 | 3.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.05% | 75,439 | 11.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.65% | 2,325 | 15.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.33% | 2,595 | 6.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.04% | 178 | 21.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.58% | 487 | 7.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.05% | 6,773 | 4.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 266 | 26.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 48,229 | 8.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.96% | 802 | 14.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.12% | 138 | 1.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.80% | 947 | 43.2% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,921 | 14.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.35% | 28,423 | 3.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.54% | 933 | 23.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 14.3% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.63% | 64,193 | 3.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.30% | 5,501 | 27.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 192 | 8.4% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.23% | 258 | 29.4% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 7.2% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,578 | 21.5% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,395 | 9.0% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.06% | 962 | 12.8% |