Seminole vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Seminole
Luxembourger
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Seminole
Luxembourgers
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,024,519 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 65.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.35% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 15.5% |
| Range | 31.9% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 3.7% |
| Median | 7.7% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.50%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |