Choctaw Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Disability Age 65 to 74
Choctaw Disability Age 65 to 74
30.2%
DISABILITY | AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,363,120 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 30.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.93% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (30.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Native/Alaskan (30.4%, a difference of 0.66%), Hopi (30.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and Colville (30.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 28.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 29.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 29.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 29.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 29.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 29.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
Choctaw Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw Data | Disability Age 65 to 74 Data |
Minimum | 0.081% | 18.3% |
Maximum | 80.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 80.3% | 81.7% |
Mean | 19.8% | 47.9% |
Median | 18.0% | 41.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 36.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 53.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.4% | 18.5% |
Correlation Details
Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 255,957,800 | 25.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,486,129 | 29.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 3,034,448 | 30.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,676,224 | 30.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 569,780 | 33.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 419,200 | 36.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 216,921 | 41.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 158,464 | 37.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 103,530 | 33.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 44,469 | 41.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 44,110 | 35.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 34,670 | 41.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 22,776 | 40.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 96,691 | 39.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 42,375 | 41.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 24,160 | 34.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 13,644 | 46.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,505 | 42.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 3,688 | 33.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 10,003 | 45.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,765 | 42.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,676 | 38.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 4,389 | 39.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,242 | 36.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 65,987 | 36.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 11,673 | 52.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.87% | 4,826 | 43.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,728 | 31.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 6,406 | 32.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,855 | 33.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 25,206 | 40.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.36% | 1,458 | 49.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.96% | 4,293 | 46.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 44.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,782 | 47.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 7,640 | 41.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 47.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,031 | 39.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.81% | 489 | 79.4% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,462 | 37.0% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 37.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,885 | 36.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 43.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.45% | 1,478 | 53.2% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 11,047 | 41.3% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 706 | 57.4% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 31.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 43.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 42.9% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 18.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 44.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 30.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 84.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 39.6% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 40.9% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 2,115 | 65.8% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 21.3% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 60.4% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 100.0% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.20% | 1,076 | 48.2% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 234 | 79.6% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 58.7% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.53% | 621 | 42.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 99 | 83.8% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 58.8% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.21% | 71 | 47.8% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 60.4% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.03% | 136 | 68.4% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 63.6% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.50% | 40 | 75.0% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 38.00% | 350 | 64.7% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.42% | 76 | 100.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.11% | 90 | 100.0% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 100.0% |