Choctaw Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Poverty
Choctaw Poverty
15.6%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,626,558 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682 and weighted average of 15.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.35% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Seminole (15.6%, a difference of 0.040%), African (15.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Chippewa (15.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.4% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.6% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
Choctaw Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw Data | Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.081% | 13.0% |
Maximum | 98.1% | 58.1% |
Range | 98.1% | 45.1% |
Mean | 21.9% | 23.1% |
Median | 18.5% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 25.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.4% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.5% | 9.6% |
Correlation Details
Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 256,196,199 | 13.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,489,266 | 14.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 3,037,720 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,678,875 | 14.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 573,691 | 16.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 421,353 | 13.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 217,488 | 18.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 157,959 | 16.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 104,261 | 14.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 45,281 | 19.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 43,930 | 18.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 34,776 | 20.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 22,633 | 18.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 96,390 | 15.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 43,099 | 16.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 24,160 | 19.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.09% | 14,201 | 21.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,897 | 19.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 3,787 | 18.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 10,184 | 17.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,634 | 21.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,422 | 19.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.93% | 4,472 | 17.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,242 | 18.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 65,870 | 21.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 11,673 | 17.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.87% | 4,826 | 18.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,758 | 21.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 6,406 | 24.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,855 | 17.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 25,025 | 19.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 1,574 | 21.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.95% | 4,665 | 13.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 18,037 | 26.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,782 | 24.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 7,872 | 21.9% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 27.9% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,254 | 22.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.81% | 489 | 30.2% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,587 | 24.7% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 18.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,885 | 21.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 16.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.45% | 1,478 | 29.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 11,047 | 23.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 746 | 14.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 21.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 27.5% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 23.9% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,344 | 39.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 20.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 18.2% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 25.6% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 17.6% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 15.6% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 2,115 | 21.5% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 15.5% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 20.0% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 30.7% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 1,196 | 30.5% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.43% | 46 | 19.6% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 39.0% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.53% | 621 | 37.7% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 24 | 45.8% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 31.2% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 21.1% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.03% | 136 | 20.6% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 16.2% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 38.00% | 350 | 21.7% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.42% | 76 | 28.6% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 52.9% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.58% | 73 | 37.1% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 37.9% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.76% | 573 | 15.0% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 58.1% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.14% | 376 | 57.2% |