Burmese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Burmese Single Father Poverty
15.5%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,001,827 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.8% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Burmese and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Burmese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Burmese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Brazilian (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (15.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (15.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants from Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Burmese Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 46.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 46.2% | 96.8% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 26.6% |
| Median | 8.7% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 26.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 26.7% |
Correlation Details
| Burmese Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 154,113,386 | 18.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 87,511,469 | 15.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 38,165,494 | 14.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 26,333,235 | 14.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 11,583,838 | 14.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 9,641,091 | 12.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 5,559,434 | 13.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 3,497,391 | 15.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 2,315,736 | 13.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 5,759,180 | 15.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 1,446,923 | 13.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.63% | 951,602 | 14.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.90% | 1,076,420 | 13.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 855,867 | 22.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.50% | 773,077 | 18.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 399,249 | 13.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 642,956 | 10.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.44% | 458,540 | 17.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.73% | 212,926 | 10.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 619,586 | 20.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.31% | 117,185 | 27.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 151,111 | 17.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 181,804 | 13.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 209,416 | 16.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.67% | 94,774 | 18.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.86% | 425,118 | 10.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.35% | 22,240 | 20.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60% | 103,949 | 36.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 145,454 | 6.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.17% | 46,075 | 10.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.51% | 116,368 | 6.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 44,280 | 16.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.21% | 57,699 | 3.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 3,652 | 75.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.74% | 129,419 | 17.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.01% | 191,417 | 15.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 59,410 | 9.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 225,822 | 10.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.18% | 151,721 | 28.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.53% | 43,315 | 4.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 56,628 | 23.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.44% | 22,723 | 84.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 125,746 | 5.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 9,652 | 100.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.64% | 15,522 | 12.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.26% | 486 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 32,344 | 37.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.38% | 30,598 | 66.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.45% | 28,788 | 26.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.28% | 5,336 | 78.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.48% | 132,379 | 7.2% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 37,754 | 25.4% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.72% | 43,169 | 46.8% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.19% | 18,564 | 12.5% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.17% | 324 | 100.0% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.33% | 4,185 | 100.0% |