Salvadoran vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Tsimshian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Tsimshian
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,885,602 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,607,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 10.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 19.7% | 16.0% |
| Range | 19.3% | 14.2% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 5.9% |
| Median | 6.6% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Cree (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (5.9%, a difference of 0.46%), Iraqi (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |