Yuman vs Dutch West Indian Disability
COMPARE
Yuman
Dutch West Indian
Disability
Disability Comparison
Yuman
Dutch West Indians
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Dutch West Indian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,643 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,770,416 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Dutch West Indian |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 6.3% |
| Maximum | 37.0% | 32.7% |
| Range | 33.4% | 26.4% |
| Mean | 18.4% | 18.2% |
| Median | 18.4% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Dutch West Indians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.39%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 0.91%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |