Yuman vs Tsimshian Disability
COMPARE
Yuman
Tsimshian
Disability
Disability Comparison
Yuman
Tsimshian
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Tsimshian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,643 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 10.4%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 9.0% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 30.5% |
Range | 33.4% | 21.5% |
Mean | 18.4% | 18.5% |
Median | 18.4% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Tsimshian by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 2.2%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 3.5%), Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |