Scottish Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Scottish
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Scottish Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
20.9%
POVERTY | FEMALES 18-24
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,782,513 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 20.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.7% in poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Scottish and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Scottish influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 within an area, or if Scottish simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Singapore (20.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Guatemala (20.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Luxembourger (20.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eritrea (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Okinawan (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Whites/Caucasians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 6.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Finns | 6.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 5.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Welsh | 5.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 5.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Okinawans | 4.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Scottish | 4.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 4.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Immigrants from Eritrea | 4.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Israelis | 4.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Immigrants from Thailand | 3.4 /100 | #244 | Tragic 20.9% |
Scottish Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish Data | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.27% | 6.3% |
| Maximum | 66.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 66.1% | 93.7% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 49.0% |
| Median | 13.0% | 30.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.8% | 82.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 61.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 32.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 32.5% |
Correlation Details
| Scottish Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 91,253,210 | 21.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 102,565,361 | 20.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 103,186,118 | 21.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 90,085,593 | 19.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 60,503,715 | 20.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 38,827,327 | 21.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 19,898,697 | 20.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 11,303,936 | 21.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 6,657,991 | 19.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.72% | 3,189,644 | 20.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 2,048,574 | 22.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.70% | 1,145,680 | 21.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 571,137 | 25.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 425,375 | 29.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 335,903 | 20.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 165,568 | 26.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 173,526 | 24.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.78% | 108,851 | 27.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 52,007 | 29.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.76% | 56,227 | 28.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 26,960 | 32.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 51,292 | 32.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.18% | 34,795 | 52.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.69% | 17,926 | 28.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.21% | 21,615 | 19.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.76% | 12,409 | 19.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.17% | 10,687 | 40.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 5,915 | 25.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.25% | 8,112 | 34.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.91% | 11,987 | 75.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.27% | 2,200 | 68.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 2,530 | 56.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.24% | 1,065 | 79.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.17% | 1,852 | 69.8% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.64% | 6,104 | 6.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.19% | 1,391 | 56.0% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.80% | 4,425 | 41.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.60% | 611 | 18.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.65% | 2,265 | 46.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.02% | 443 | 100.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.97% | 363 | 100.0% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.22% | 161 | 85.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.80% | 125 | 100.0% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.33% | 533 | 100.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 192 | 100.0% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.63% | 514 | 100.0% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.12% | 128 | 100.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.59% | 808 | 98.7% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.60% | 154 | 100.0% |
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.45% | 141 | 100.0% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.05% | 174 | 100.0% |
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.33% | 196 | 100.0% |