White/Caucasian vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Ute
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Ute
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,545,567 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.865 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 33.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Ute |
Minimum | 3.3% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 32.8% |
Range | 10.8% | 28.6% |
Mean | 6.4% | 11.0% |
Median | 6.3% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |