Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Immigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Yup'ik
Immigrants from Oceania
62.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,964,003 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 62.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,520,725 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.717 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 4.4%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 32.3% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 86.8% |
| Range | 67.7% | 77.7% |
| Mean | 63.0% | 59.8% |
| Median | 63.6% | 63.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.5% | 54.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 66.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 15.2% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Potawatomi (62.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Chickasaw (62.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |