Bhutanese vs Burmese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Burmese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Burmese
49.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
49.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Burmese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,135,047 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 49.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,866,079 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 49.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Burmese |
| Minimum | 18.2% | 22.5% |
| Maximum | 78.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 60.7% | 77.5% |
| Mean | 51.0% | 57.1% |
| Median | 51.5% | 55.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 47.0% | 48.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.1% | 62.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Burmese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Scotland (49.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Philippines (49.3%, a difference of 0.15%), German (49.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (49.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Bolivian (49.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Korean (49.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Swedish (49.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (49.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Germans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 49.2% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 49.2% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 49.2% |