Hungarian vs Ute 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Hungarian
Ute
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Hungarians
Ute
56.5%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.6%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Ute 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,946,107 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 56.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,301 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 56.6%, a difference of 0.13%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | Ute |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 32.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 94.8% | 68.0% |
| Mean | 63.4% | 67.6% |
| Median | 64.5% | 67.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 47.2% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.5% | 75.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.4% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.4% | 14.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.2% | 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and Ute by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Bulgarian (56.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Comanche (56.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (56.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (56.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from South Central Asia (56.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (56.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Estonian (56.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Bulgarian (56.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Costa Ricans | 94.7 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 56.9% |
| Sioux | 93.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 56.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 86.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Cubans | 84.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Salvadorans | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Armenians | 84.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Latvians | 83.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 56.2% |