Immigrants from Asia vs Tongan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Tongan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Tongans
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Tongan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,014,921 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,697,029 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Tongan |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 16.6% | 18.0% |
| Range | 15.4% | 17.2% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.5% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Tongans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |