Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Family Income | $100k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha

0.0%
80.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Families with Income > $100k vs State vs National
1.6813576.9%45.7%(+31.2)#1246.1%(+30.8)#1,411
2.6811875.2%45.7%(+29.5)#1646.1%(+29.1)#1,678
3.6813075.0%45.7%(+29.3)#1746.1%(+28.9)#1,697
4.6813670.1%45.7%(+24.4)#2646.1%(+24.0)#2,577
5.6811666.2%45.7%(+20.5)#3746.1%(+20.1)#3,435
6.6812465.1%45.7%(+19.4)#3946.1%(+19.0)#3,724
7.6814263.3%45.7%(+17.6)#4746.1%(+17.2)#4,200
8.6812262.2%45.7%(+16.5)#5146.1%(+16.1)#4,496
9.6815460.2%45.7%(+14.5)#5646.1%(+14.1)#5,069
10.6815258.3%45.7%(+12.6)#7246.1%(+12.2)#5,675
11.6813255.8%45.7%(+10.1)#9046.1%(+9.70)#6,514
12.6810255.2%45.7%(+9.50)#9646.1%(+9.10)#6,729
13.6811455.0%45.7%(+9.30)#9946.1%(+8.90)#6,798
14.6814454.2%45.7%(+8.50)#10546.1%(+8.10)#7,097
15.6813853.9%45.7%(+8.20)#10646.1%(+7.80)#7,195
16.6816450.6%45.7%(+4.90)#13046.1%(+4.50)#8,564
17.6815750.4%45.7%(+4.70)#13146.1%(+4.30)#8,663
18.6813747.2%45.7%(+1.50)#16146.1%(+1.10)#10,186
19.6810647.0%45.7%(+1.30)#16446.1%(+0.900)#10,295
20.6812738.3%45.7%(-7.40)#28746.1%(-7.80)#15,529
21.6813436.0%45.7%(-9.70)#33046.1%(-10.1)#17,185
22.6813135.4%45.7%(-10.3)#34446.1%(-10.7)#17,611
23.6810533.0%45.7%(-12.7)#38246.1%(-13.1)#19,300
24.6810432.4%45.7%(-13.3)#39246.1%(-13.7)#19,729
25.6811230.5%45.7%(-15.2)#41446.1%(-15.6)#21,061
26.6811727.1%45.7%(-18.6)#45246.1%(-19.0)#23,362
27.6810723.8%45.7%(-21.9)#48746.1%(-22.3)#25,385
28.6810820.1%45.7%(-25.6)#50446.1%(-26.0)#27,191
29.6811010.0%45.7%(-35.7)#54846.1%(-36.1)#30,322
30.681119.1%45.7%(-36.6)#55146.1%(-37.0)#30,470

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
76.9%
#2
75.2%
#3
75.0%
#4
70.1%
#5
66.2%
#6
65.1%
#7
63.3%
#8
62.2%
#9
60.2%
#10
58.3%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha, NE?
68135 has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha, NE with 76.9%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Omaha is 46.2%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Nebraska?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Nebraska is 45.7%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in the United States is 46.1%.