Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Birth Rate | In Labor Force
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha

0.0
200.0
Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Births / 1,000 Women vs State vs National
1.68112152.059.0(+93.0)#6148.0(+104)#1,634
2.68152116.059.0(+57.0)#10048.0(+68.0)#2,671
3.68157109.059.0(+50.0)#11048.0(+61.0)#3,004
4.6811098.059.0(+39.0)#12148.0(+50.0)#3,634
5.6812789.059.0(+30.0)#12848.0(+41.0)#4,302
6.6811481.059.0(+22.0)#14548.0(+33.0)#5,158
7.6810476.059.0(+17.0)#15448.0(+28.0)#5,756
8.6814276.059.0(+17.0)#15548.0(+28.0)#5,826
9.6810573.059.0(+14.0)#15948.0(+25.0)#6,193
10.6813072.059.0(+13.0)#16548.0(+24.0)#6,363
11.6810769.059.0(+10.00)#17448.0(+21.0)#6,855
12.6816468.059.0(+9.00)#17948.0(+20.0)#7,067
13.6812468.059.0(+9.00)#18148.0(+20.0)#7,100
14.6811764.059.0(+5.00)#19348.0(+16.0)#7,923
15.6811863.059.0(+4.00)#19548.0(+15.0)#8,128
16.6813462.059.0(+3.00)#19748.0(+14.0)#8,320
17.6813560.059.0(+1.000)#20648.0(+12.0)#8,743
18.6811157.059.0(-2.00)#21948.0(+9.00)#9,466
19.6812255.059.0(-4.00)#22948.0(+7.00)#10,047
20.6810847.059.0(-12.0)#26248.0(-1.000)#12,349
21.6813846.059.0(-13.0)#26748.0(-2.00)#12,673
22.6814445.059.0(-14.0)#26948.0(-3.00)#12,899
23.6813745.059.0(-14.0)#27048.0(-3.00)#12,905
24.6815445.059.0(-14.0)#27148.0(-3.00)#12,911
25.6813244.059.0(-15.0)#27848.0(-4.00)#13,296
26.6811640.059.0(-19.0)#29048.0(-8.00)#14,514
27.6813633.059.0(-26.0)#31748.0(-15.0)#16,818
28.6810626.059.0(-33.0)#34248.0(-22.0)#18,881
29.6810226.059.0(-33.0)#34348.0(-22.0)#18,942
30.6813116.059.0(-43.0)#37948.0(-32.0)#21,385

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE are:
#1
152.0
#2
116.0
#3
109.0
#4
98.0
#5
89.0
#6
81.0
#7
76.0
#8
76.0
#9
73.0
#10
72.0
What zip code has the Most Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE?
68112 has the Most Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE with 152.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha is 59.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Nebraska?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Nebraska is 59.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States is 48.0.