Pima Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
Pima Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
$73,365
HOUSEHOLD INCOME | AGE 45-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,504,039 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.471 and weighted average of $73,365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of $312 in household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham ($73,774, a difference of 0.56%), Crow ($74,257, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Yemen ($74,575, a difference of 1.7%), Houma ($72,093, a difference of 1.8%), and Kiowa ($74,815, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic $77,850 |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic $76,903 |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic $76,362 |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic $75,945 |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic $75,601 |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic $75,562 |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic $74,815 |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic $74,575 |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic $74,257 |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic $73,774 |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic $73,365 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic $72,093 |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic $69,759 |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic $69,234 |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic $65,113 |
Pima Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | $22,031 |
| Maximum | 90.9% | $97,330 |
| Range | 90.9% | $75,299 |
| Mean | 26.4% | $64,464 |
| Median | 5.3% | $60,256 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | $48,406 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | $90,706 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 71.0% | $42,300 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.8% | $23,791 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 35.0% | $23,218 |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,524,690 | $88,416 |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 533,740 | $75,476 |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 220,995 | $70,126 |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 64,375 | $92,997 |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 53,054 | $76,682 |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | $60,256 |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 5,800 | $37,214 |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | $54,528 |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | $34,770 |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,156 | $97,330 |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | $93,227 |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 1,178 | $52,292 |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | $96,250 |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | $47,005 |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | $95,833 |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | $50,882 |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | $58,558 |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | $29,020 |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | $49,808 |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 2,128 | $22,031 |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | $71,042 |