Costa Rican vs Menominee Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Menominee
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Menominee
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Menominee Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,586,429 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,721,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Menominee |
Minimum | 0.54% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 27.6% | 20.0% |
Range | 27.0% | 18.9% |
Mean | 6.0% | 5.4% |
Median | 5.0% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Menominee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Marshallese (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ukraine (5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
Spanish | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 39.3 /100 | #180 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |