Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Creek
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,800,208 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 53.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Creek |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 6.8% | 11.5% |
Range | 6.2% | 10.8% |
Mean | 2.4% | 4.5% |
Median | 2.1% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |