Immigrants from South Africa vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Creek
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,222,881 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 55.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 11.5% |
| Range | 8.2% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 4.5% |
| Median | 2.2% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Afghanistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Australian (2.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Estonians | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |