Immigrants from Lithuania vs Israeli Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Israeli
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Israelis
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Israeli Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,724,932 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,184,121 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.95%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Israeli |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 17.7% | 28.5% |
Range | 15.5% | 26.1% |
Mean | 10.9% | 11.4% |
Median | 10.6% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Israelis by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from El Salvador (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Spain (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), South American (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Salvadoran (10.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Nepal (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Japan (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cambodian (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Mongolian (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Israelis | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Vietnamese | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.9% |
South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |