Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Hmong

Good
Average
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,093,096 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 13.9 Hmong.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $84,258, a difference of 52.1%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $38,120, a difference of 48.8%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $75,839, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $49,364, a difference of 25.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $56,339, a difference of 27.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHmong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 49.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHmong
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 79.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHmong
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 27.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.0%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.5%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHmong
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHmong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 76.7%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 71.1%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 60.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 54.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 15.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongHmong
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%