Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Panamanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,408,288 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Panamanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Panamanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $90,193, a difference of 42.1%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $82,272, a difference of 35.5%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $42,035, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,611, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $58,266, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 44.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 47.3%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 45.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.17%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.5%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 54.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 45.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.7%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.8%).