Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Immigrants from Congo

Good
Fair
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Congo Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,589,573 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 48.2 Immigrants from Congo.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $72,178, a difference of 77.5%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $66,768, a difference of 67.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $77,850, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.7%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $51,393, a difference of 39.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $43,266, a difference of 43.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Congo
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Tragic
$35,720
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Tragic
$82,216
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Tragic
$66,768
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Tragic
$39,169
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Tragic
$44,204
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Tragic
$34,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Tragic
$43,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Tragic
$72,178
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Tragic
$77,850
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Tragic
$51,393
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Exceptional
21.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 92.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 85.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Congo
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
17.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
24.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
23.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
22.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
22.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
33.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Congo
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 36.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Congo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 67.8%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 56.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.84%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.89%), and family households (66.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 11.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Congo
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
39.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
41.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
36.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 0.85%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Congo
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
52.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 75.9%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 74.1%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Congo
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Tragic
41.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
33.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 62.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Congo
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%