Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Serbians

Good
Excellent
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,075,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 31.2 Serbians.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Serbian Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $98,320, a difference of 30.3%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $87,572, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $103,522, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.5%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $61,087, a difference of 17.2%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $57,975, a difference of 21.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSerbian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 31.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.6%), poverty (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and female poverty (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSerbian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSerbian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 31.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 30.2%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.12, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSerbian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Good
30.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.43%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.7%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.3%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSerbian
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%