Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,607,556 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $91,171, a difference of 40.6%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $82,560, a difference of 35.1%), and median family income ($131,067 compared to $98,205, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,302, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $56,975, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 42.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 40.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.9%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.56%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 43.8%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.90%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 64.7%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.2%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.050%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.2%).