Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Uruguayan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Uruguayans

Good
Average
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Uruguayan Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,300,914 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 14.9 Uruguayans.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Uruguayan Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $93,631, a difference of 36.9%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $84,691, a difference of 31.7%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $53,680, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,465, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $59,090, a difference of 21.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongUruguayan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Good
$44,318
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Fair
$100,656
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Average
$84,691
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Average
$46,190
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Fair
$53,680
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Fair
$39,228
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Good
$52,465
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Fair
$93,631
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Fair
$98,660
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Poor
$59,090
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Excellent
25.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 37.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongUruguayan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
12.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Average
16.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
11.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongUruguayan
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongUruguayan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Good
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Excellent
83.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 40.4%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.9%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.54%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.77%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongUruguayan
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Poor
45.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
45.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Poor
33.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongUruguayan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and 10th grade (93.1% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongUruguayan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
90.4%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Poor
64.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Fair
58.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Average
46.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Good
38.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Uruguayan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongUruguayan
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%