Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,928,718 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 17.6 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $106,103, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,400, a difference of 18.5%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $95,277, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $68,208, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $52,503, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 29.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and single male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.3%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 21.8%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.12, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.2%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.63%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.4%).