Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,170,839 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 8.8 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $86,109, a difference of 48.8%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $79,103, a difference of 41.0%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $51,489, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $59,248, a difference of 20.8%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $38,511, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 54.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 34.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 42.4%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (66.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.1%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.1%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.4%).