Immigrants from Hong Kong vs West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,575,157 people shows no correlation between the proportion of West Indians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $87,205, a difference of 46.9%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $78,455, a difference of 42.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $89,906, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,583, a difference of 20.3%), median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $40,317, a difference of 23.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $54,936, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 78.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 66.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 65.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and single mother poverty (24.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 45.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 71.3%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 62.2%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 58.1%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.97%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 109.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 39.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 74.3%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 58.2%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.9%).